USO DA CLASSIFICAÇÃO DE ROBSON NA ADMISSÃO DE GESTANTES PARA PARTO NAS MATERNIDADES E CASAS DE PARTO PÚBLICAS DO DISTRITO FEDERAL, BRASÍLIA, BRASIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29327/5412471Keywords:
Delivery Rooms, Obstetric Delivery, Midwifery, Cesarean SectionAbstract
The high rate of cesarean section, in opposition to the World Health Organization recommendations, remains a global challenge in maternal and child health. The Robson Classification, proposed in 2001 and widely adopted, emerges as a standardized tool to monitor and compare cesarean section rates in different contexts, allowing the assessment of the impact of management adjustments. Despite the various advantages of this classification, it does not take into account other maternal or fetal factors that significantly influence cesarean section rates, such as high-risk pregnancies and fetal alterations. As a conclusion presented to the Stricto Sensu Graduate Program in Health Sciences at the School of Health Sciences, as a partial requirement for obtaining the Master's Degree in Health Sciences, a cross-sectional observational study was conducted with secondary data obtained from medical records of pregnant women undergoing delivery in the context of a high-risk maternity hospital in the Federal District. The objective was to evaluate the Robson Classification in the context of a high-risk public maternity hospital in the Federal District in Brasília, Brazil, analyzing pregnant women who gave birth at the facility according to the Robson Classification, stratifying women according to low or high-risk situations. Based on the study results, the Protocol for the use of the Robson Classification in the admission of pregnant women for delivery in public maternity hospitals and birthing centers of the Federal District in Brasília, Brazil, is presented. Search strategies for the development of this protocol included database searches for scientific articles in journals indexed in databases such as PubMed, Lilacs, Medline, Scielo, legislation, and other protocols that address the monitoring of women during childbirth. It is expected that the systematic use of the Robson Classification in the maternity hospitals and birthing centers of SES-DF will serve as a tool to monitor cesarean section rates in the region's population, allowing for the evaluation and improvement of the quality of obstetric care, based on the assessment of the impact of management changes that may contribute to good health practices in the Federal District.
References
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO). Appropriate Technology For Birth. The Lancet, [S.L.], v. 326, n. 8452, p. 436-437, ago. 1985. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92750-3
LOW, James. Caesarean Section—Past and Present. Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynaecology Canada, [S.L.], v. 31, n. 12, p. 1131-1136, dez. 2009. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34373-0
VILLAR, José; VALLADARES, Eliette; WOJDYLA, Daniel; ZAVALETA, Nelly; CARROLI, Guillermo; VELAZCO, Alejandro; SHAH, Archana; CAMPODÓNICO, Liana; BATAGLIA, Vicente; FAUNDES, Anibal. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 who global survey on maternal and perinatal health in latin america. The Lancet, [S.L.], v. 367, n. 9525, p. 1819-1829, jun. 2006. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68704-7
VILLAR, José; CARROLI, Guillermo; ZAVALETA, Nelly; DONNER, Allan; WOJDYLA, Daniel; FAUNDES, Anibal; VELAZCO, Alejandro; BATAGLIA, Vicente; LANGER, Ana; NARVÁEZ, Alberto. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study. Bmj, [S.L.], v. 335, n. 7628, p. 1025, 30 out. 2007. BMJ. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39363.706956.55
LUMBIGANON, Pisake; LAOPAIBOON, Malinee; GÜLMEZOGLU, A Metin; SOUZA, João Paulo; TANEEPANICHSKUL, Surasak; RUYAN, Pang; ATTYGALLE, Deepika Eranjanie; SHRESTHA, Naveen; MORI, Rintaro; HINH, Nguyen Duc. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the who global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007⠳08. The Lancet, [S.L.], v. 375, n. 9713, p. 490-499, fev. 2010. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61870-5
BETRÁN, Ana P.; MERIALDI, Mario; LAUER, Jeremy A.; BING-SHUN, Wang; THOMAS, Jane; VAN LOOK, Paul; WAGNER, Marsden. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatric And Perinatal Epidemiology, [S.L.], v. 21, n. 2, p. 98-113, mar. 2007. Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00786.x
GIBBONS, Luz; BELIZÁN, José; LAUER, Jeremy; BETRÁN, Ana; MERIALDI, Mario; ALTHABE, Fernando. The Global Numbers and Costs of Additionally Needed and Unnecessary Caesarean Sections Performed per Year: Overuse as a Barrier to Universal Coverage. HEALTH SYSTEMS FINANCING. World Health Report 2010. 30. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/the-global-numbers-and-costs-of-additionally-needed-and-unnecessary-caesarean-sections-performed-per-year-overuse-as-a-barrier-to-universal-coverage
TORLONI, Maria Regina; BETRAN, Ana Pilar; SOUZA, Joao Paulo; WIDMER, Mariana; ALLEN, Tomas; GULMEZOGLU, Metin; MERIALDI, Mario. Classifications for Cesarean Section: a systematic review. Plos One, [S.L.], v. 6, n. 1, p. e14566, 20 jan. 2011. Public Library of Science (PLoS). http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014566
ROBSON, Michael. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal And Maternal Medicine Review, [S.L.], v. 12, n. 1, p. 23-39, 17 jan. 2001. Cambridge University Press (CUP). http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0965539501000122
BETRÁN, Ana Pilar; VINDEVOGHEL, Nadia; SOUZA, Joao Paulo; GÜLMEZOGLU, A. Metin; TORLONI, Maria Regina. A Systematic Review of the Robson Classification for Caesarean Section: what works, doesn't work and how to improve it. Plos One, [S.L.], v. 9, n. 6, p. 97769, 3 jun. 2014. Public Library of Science (PLoS). http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097769
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO) (2015). WHO statement on caesarean section rates. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/161442
ROBSON, Michael; HARTIGAN, Lucia; MURPHY, Martina. Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, [S.L.], v. 27, n. 2, p. 297-308, abr. 2013. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.004
VENGOECHEA, Pedro José Cabeza; PÉREZ, Andrés Calvo; BETRÁN, Ana Pilar; MOREY, María del Mar Mas; BORGES, María Mercedes Febles; ALCÁCER, Paula Ximena; ALCOVER, Ana Ramallo; VILLAMIEL, Enrique Francisco Campos; ANTOLÍN, Eva María Morán; REHKUGLER, Sabine. Clasificación de cesáreas por Grupos de Robson en dos periodos comparativos en el Hospital de Manacor. Progresos de Obstetricia y Ginecología, [S.L.], v. 53, n. 10, p. 385-390, out. 2010. ARAN Ediciones. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pog.2010.05.003
SCARELLA, Anibal; CHAMY, Verónica; SEPðLVEDA, Marcela; BELIZÁN, José M.. Medical audit using the Ten Group Classification System and its impact on the cesarean section rate. European Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynecology And Reproductive Biology, [S.L.], v. 154, n. 2, p. 136-140, fev. 2011. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.09.005
HOMER, Caroline S.e.; KURINCZUK, Jennifer J.; SPARK, Patsy; BROCKLEHURST, Peter; KNIGHT, Marian. A novel use of a classification system to audit severe maternal morbidity. Midwifery, [S.L.], v. 26, n. 5, p. 532-536, out. 2010. Elsevier BV. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2010.03.010
HOWELL, Stuart; JOHNSTON, Trisha; MACLEOD, Sue-Lynne. Trends and determinants of caesarean sections births in Queensland, 1997-2006. Australian And New Zealand Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynaecology, [S.L.], v. 49, n. 6, p. 606-611, dez. 2009. Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828x.2009.01100.x
APGAR, Virginia. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Originally published in July 1953, volume 32, pages 250-259. Anesthesia & Analgesia, [S.L.], v. 120, n. 5, p. 1056-1059, may. 2015. Wolters Kluwer Health. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31829bdc5c
SAVCHENKO, Julia; LADFORS, Lars; HJERTBERG, Linda; HILDEBRAND, Eric; WENDEL, Sophia Brismar. A step towards better audit: the robson ten group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, [S.L.], v. 101, n. 7, p. 827-835, 16 mar. 2022. Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14350.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO). Robson classification: implementation manual. World Health Organization (2017). https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/259512. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO Acesso em: 06 dez. 2022.
BRASIL, Ministério da Saúde. Portaria GM/MS nº 13, de 13 de janeiro de 2023. Diário Oficial da União. https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2023/prt0013_16_01_2023.html Acesso em: 17 abr. 2024.
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Departamento de Análise Epidemiológica e Vigilância de Doenças Não Transmissíveis. Apresentação do Sistema de Informações sobre Nascidos Vivos (SINASC). Disponível em: https://svs.aids.gov.br/daent/cgiae/sinasc/apresentacao/ Acesso em: 06 dez. 2022.
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Departamento de Análise Epidemiológica e Vigilância de Doenças Não Transmissíveis. Painel de Monitoramento de Nascidos Vivos segundo Classificação de Risco Epidemiológico (Grupos de Robson). 2022. Disponível em: https://svs.aids.gov.br/daent/centrais-de-conteudos/paineis-de-monitoramento/natalidade/grupos-de-robson/ Acesso em: 06 dez. 2022.
ZUGAIB, Marcelo; BITTAR, Roberto Eduardo; MIYADAHIRA, Seizo. Estatísticas Vitais e suas Definições. In: Zugaib M (Ed.). Zugaib Obstetrícia. Barueri-SP: Manole, 2008. cap. 1, p.58-69.
FUNDAÇÃO OSWALDO CRUZ (FIOCRUZ). Instituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira. Portal de Boas Práticas em Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente. Postagens: Classificação de Robson. Rio de Janeiro, 2018. Disponível em: https://portaldeboaspraticas.iff.fiocruz.br/atencao-mulher/classificacao-de-robson/ Acesso em: 06 dez. 2022.
NASSAR, N. et al. Systematic review of adverse outcomes of external cephalic version and persisting breech presentation at term. Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, v. 20, n. 2, p. 163–171, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00702.x